| 10 | 10 | The Non-Commercial clause is ambiguous; It's not clear what constitutes a commercial re-use and what specifically is non-commercial. Even if it was unambiguous, it would make the content not free for re-use by people who do legitimately need remuneration for their efforts in re-mixing, adapting, or re-publishing the information here. We tend to think speech should be free, and we don't want licensing to get in the way of communication. You might want to read [https://lists.mayfirst.org/pipermail/support-team/2011-August/000439.html some of the early discussion about this transition]. |
