Changes between Version 7 and Version 8 of projects/leadership-committee/process
- Timestamp:
- Nov 16, 2011, 6:31:29 PM (12 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
projects/leadership-committee/process
v7 v8 25 25 Direction is long term. Infrastructure, Collaboration, Message/Communication and, at times Staffing, can be opportunity based and more time-sensitive. 26 26 27 HG: weekly staff meetings are where issues are discussed and decisions made. many issues are tabled for future meetings, but decisions are made on a weekly basis. These meetings include staff, co directors, sometimes support team members and other lc members who do a lot of work with MF/PL. Whether these meetings are open to more involvement/participation is a question to consider.27 HG: weekly staff meetings are where a lot of the day to day issues are discussed and decisions made. many issues are tabled for future meetings, but decisions are made on a weekly basis. These meetings include staff, co directors, sometimes support team members and other lc members who do a lot of work with MF/PL. Whether these meetings are open to more involvement/participation is a useful question. 28 28 29 29 === Scope === … … 62 62 What have the benefits of the decision-making process to date been? What have the drawbacks been? 63 63 64 HG: what I see as an important clarification is to decide what decisions should be made by staff, directors, lc and support team. for example - some sample ideas: should there be an approval process for equipments charges of a certain amount; conference requests; new member requests; when tech upgrades are needed; etc. at what point can working groups have autonomy over operationsand what decisions need larger leadership review? I think that's the critical question.64 HG: I think the above questions are important, but I think we also need to start brainstorming which kinds of content decisions should be made by staff, directors, lc and support team. for example - some sample ideas: should there be an approval process for equipments charges above a certain amount; conference requests; new member requests; when tech upgrades are needed; etc. at what point can working groups have autonomy over their work and what decisions need larger leadership review? I think that's the critical question.