Changes between Version 6 and Version 7 of projects/leadership-committee/process


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Nov 16, 2011, 6:28:29 PM (14 years ago)
Author:
Hilary Goldstein
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • projects/leadership-committee/process

    v6 v7  
    1313 * Infrastructure: what areas to focus on, what technologies to use, what and when to buy new equipment
    1414 * Collaboration: within the given political direction, what coalitions to join, what conferences to attend, what to present, etc.
    15  * Message/Communication: how and what to communicate with memers
     15 * Message/Communication: how and what to communicate with members
    1616 * Staffing: who/when to recruit or hire for staff
     17
     18HG: other recent decisions made about membership dues and limits, deadlines for payments and processes for removing non paying members.
     19utilizing new accounting software
    1720
    1821=== Timing ===
    … …  
    2124
    2225Direction is long term. Infrastructure, Collaboration, Message/Communication and, at times Staffing, can be opportunity based and more time-sensitive.
     26
     27HG: weekly staff meetings are where issues are discussed and decisions made.  many issues are tabled for future meetings, but decisions are made on a weekly basis.  These meetings include staff, co directors, sometimes support team members and other lc members who do a lot of work with MF/PL.  Whether these meetings are open to more involvement/participation is a question to consider.
    2328
    2429=== Scope ===
    … …  
    4752 followed up on?
    4853
     54HG: we've started taking notes of the weekly staff meetings which are now public.  notes from LC meetings I believe are also posted online.   
     55
    4956=== Consultations ===
    5057Outside of the people actually making the decisions, who else is
    … …  
    5461=== Assessment ===
    5562What have the benefits of the decision-making process to date been? What have the drawbacks been?
     63
     64HG: what I see as an important clarification is to decide what decisions should be made by staff, directors, lc and support team.  for example - some sample ideas: should there be an approval process for equipments charges of a certain amount; conference requests; new member requests; when tech upgrades are needed; etc.  at what point can working groups have autonomy over operations and what decisions need larger leadership review?  I think that's the critical question.