Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of projects/leadership-committee/democracy/wg-concerns
- Timestamp:
- Jun 4, 2013, 2:15:25 AM (12 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
projects/leadership-committee/democracy/wg-concerns
v3 v4 13 13 * support-team 14 14 * organizational development 15 * others as needs arise... (how do members form a new working group?)15 * we will establish a process for forming new working groups 16 16 17 17 Setting up any working group needs to include defining the scope for that WG. 18 18 19 The term "core membership" refers to all people who are either on staff or in any working group.19 The term "core membership" refers to all people who are either on staff or active participants in any working group. 20 20 21 21 === Working Group Responsibilities === … … 23 23 Each working group has a set of responsibilities: 24 24 25 * regular reportbacks to the lowdown about ongoing work 25 * exciting contributions to the lowdown about ongoing work, new projects 26 * at least one active participant from each WG needs to report back to the core membership during regular core meetings and to the full membership at the annual meeting. 26 27 * maintain an easily-accessible way for members to find out what the working groups are, and how to contact them. This allows members to interact with and guide a working group without needing to commit to full participation in it. 27 28 * Each working group should maintain a publicly-archived mailing list. 29 * Maintaining a viable set of active participants and recruiting and welcoming new participants 28 30 29 31 === Working group membership === … … 36 38 * a careful and thoughtful WG membership process tends to create mutual commitment from all parties involved instead of fly-by-night flakiness 37 39 * but barriers to entry discourage participation 38 * isolated cabals are bad40 * we do not want to encourage or enable small groups of people to reserve decision-making power for themselves 39 41 40 42 === Staff membership === … … 48 50 === Decision Making and Conflict Resolution === 49 51 50 We don't currently have a clear breakdown of how decisions get made at MF/PL. We need one. Itshould include:52 We don't currently have a clear breakdown of how decisions get made at MF/PL. Under any organizational model, we need one. Such a breakdown should include: 51 53 52 * What different types of decisions are being made 53 * who initiates a given type of decision 54 * who needs to be consulted 55 * who needs to approve 54 * What different types of decisions are being made? 55 * who initiates a given type of decision? 56 * who needs to be consulted? 57 * who needs to approve? 56 58 * who needs to be informed? 57 59 58 Each working group should make decisions within its scope .60 Each working group should make decisions within its scope of work. 59 61 60 62 There are a set of shared MF/PL guidelines that we expect all WGs to adhere to: 61 63 62 * respectful communication63 * working groups need to listen to the concerns of MF/PL members who are not WG participants64 * we strive for consensus, and presume that is the baseline for decision-making ,WGs may choose their specific implementation of consensus64 * respectful and anti-oppressive communication 65 * working groups need to listen to and address the concerns of MF/PL members who are not WG participants 66 * we strive for consensus, and presume that is the baseline for decision-making. WGs may choose their specific implementation of consensus 65 67 66 Conflict resolution: 67 68 * we need to plan out a conflict resolution approach both between and within WGs: decision-making should be how it normally works, and conflict-resolution is for when decision-making process breaks down 68 We need to plan out a conflict resolution approach both between and within WGs: decision-making should be how it normally works, and conflict-resolution is for when decision-making process breaks down 69 69 70 70 === Meetings === 71 71 72 There should be at least one annual in-person meeting for the entire core .72 There should be at least one annual in-person meeting for the entire core, similar to the current yearly LC meetings. 73 73 74 the core should have regular (monthly?) synchronous meetings where WGs report back on new commitments formed and progress on outstanding commitments.74 The core should have regular (monthly?) synchronous meetings where WGs report back on new commitments formed and progress on outstanding commitments. 75 75 76 76 We encourage individual working groups to schedule in-person meetings when possible. … … 78 78 Staff has a regular weekly meeting. 79 79 80 There should be an annual membership meeting that takes place in multiple locations simultaneously and is available over the internet where possible.80 There should be an annual membership meeting that takes place in multiple physical locations simultaneously and is available over the internet where possible. 81 81 82 82 == Concerns ==