Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of projects/amc/2012/network-event/evaluation


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 8, 2012, 12:35:21 AM (7 years ago)
Author:
Hilary Goldstein
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • projects/amc/2012/network-event/evaluation

    v3 v4  
    99
    1010•       I thought everything flowed smoothly and democratically, and I was really impressed by who was in the room[[br]]       
    11 
    1211•       Awesome conversation and people[[br]]   
    13 
    14 •       MOAR [sic] please.  Round II: Technology Liberation![[br]]     
    15 
     12•       MOAR [sic] please.  Round II: Technology Liberation![[br]]
    1613•       I felt inspired and learned a lot.  Great networking opportunity.[[br]]
    17 
    1814•       Great facilitation.[[br]]       
    1915•       It was long and the room needed to be mixed up more than once so we could have a range of expertise/experience shared. [[br]]
    2016•       Progressive discussion on this topic with very bright minds in the room. [[br]]
    2117
    22 2. How would you rate the usefulness of the content? 
    23 Panel Discussion        (1      2       3 (1)   4 (5)   5 (7) )
    24 Tech Demo               (1      2       3 (3)   4 (4)   5 (5) ) 
    25 Discussion              (1      2       3 (1)   4 (3)   5 (11) )
    26 Comments:
    27 •       I really loved the small group discussion.  Will take back tech tools to my shop.
    28 •       Discussion after panel could have been moderated a bit more strategically.
    29 •       Presentations were a bit unprepared and scattered, but very informative
    30 •       Demo?  Loved the discussion.  I felt the “demo”session would have been more useful with a screen projector of the tool (a tutorial, but a visual demo)
    31 •       Great ideas and perspective.  Facilities challenge and also facilitation challenged
    32 •       PMA is hard! Not totally clear how to process
    33 •       I wish there was a lot more time for the panel because they asked the right questions.
    34 •       Lightning rounds are good, but did not allow for any literal tech demos
     182. How would you rate the usefulness of the content?  [[br]]
     19Panel Discussion        (1      2       3 (1)   4 (5)   5 (7) ) [[br]]
     20Tech Demo               (1      2       3 (3)   4 (4)   5 (5) )  [[br]]
     21Discussion              (1      2       3 (1)   4 (3)   5 (11) ) [[br]]
     22Comments:[[br]][[br]]
     23•       I really loved the small group discussion.  Will take back tech tools to my shop. [[br]]
     24•       Discussion after panel could have been moderated a bit more strategically.  [[br]]
     25•       Presentations were a bit unprepared and scattered, but very informative [[br]]
     26•       Demo?  Loved the discussion.  I felt the “demo”session would have been more useful with a screen projector of the tool (a tutorial, but a visual demo) [[br]]
     27•       Great ideas and perspective.  Facilities challenge and also facilitation challenged [[br]]
     28•       PMA is hard! Not totally clear how to process [[br]]
     29•       I wish there was a lot more time for the panel because they asked the right questions. [[br]]
     30•       Lightning rounds are good, but did not allow for any literal tech demos [[br]]
    3531
    3632
    37 3. Was there anything missing from the discussion or demonstrations?
    38 •       There could have been more effort to hear from people working directly on or in the tech industry.
    39 •       Never enough time
    40 •       Guidelines of engagement might help set context; step up/step back – use the whoa!; oppression exists but not here.  Our practice – we resist
    41 •       Not really!
    42 •       No
    43 •       There was a lot said, still observing (something scribbled)
    44 •       Demonstration of the tools presented (which look great) would have been useful.
    45 •       Practice – hands on with!  More space for what people are working on.  Could have asked: “What do YOU need?”
    46 •       The time to get to understand where other folks experiences in tech came from (even though there was no hint of bias)
    47 •       Maybe, for the tech demo to have the tools shown on the screen
    48 •       Full day of conversation instead of a 1-hour workshop
     333. Was there anything missing from the discussion or demonstrations? [[br]]
     34•       There could have been more effort to hear from people working directly on or in the tech industry. [[br]]
     35•       Never enough time [[br]]
     36•       Guidelines of engagement might help set context; step up/step back – use the whoa!; oppression exists but not here.  Our practice – we resist [[br]]
     37•       Not really! [[br]]
     38•       No [[br]]
     39•       There was a lot said, still observing (something scribbled) [[br]]
     40•       Demonstration of the tools presented (which look great) would have been useful. [[br]]
     41•       Practice – hands on with!  More space for what people are working on.  Could have asked: “What do YOU need?” [[br]]
     42•       The time to get to understand where other folks experiences in tech came from (even though there was no hint of bias) [[br]]
     43•       Maybe, for the tech demo to have the tools shown on the screen [[br]]
     44•       Full day of conversation instead of a 1-hour workshop [[br]]
    4945
    50 4. What did you like best or find most useful/interesting about the presentation?
    51 •       International perspectives
    52 •       Learning from everyones experience and perspective
    53 •       Leadership in convening this space is huge.  Than you this feels like the beginning.  ☺
    54 •       The tech tools.  Loved Rasha’ framing from the beginning.
    55 •       The chance to have meaningful discussion with such a great group of folks.
    56 •       Thought provoking
    57 •       More time, perhaps more realistic division of agenda time
    58 •       Action points/breakouts in the afternoon.  Collaborative preparation of the “document”
    59 •       Great diversity of experience and curiosity of spirit.
    60 •       Open sharing, passion and commitment.  Thanks for doing it and my participation.
    61 •       The demos and group discussion because of the selection of who was in the room and how they framed their points.
    62 •       Everything!
     464. What did you like best or find most useful/interesting about the presentation? [[br]]
     47•       International perspectives [[br]]
     48•       Learning from everyones experience and perspective [[br]]
     49•       Leadership in convening this space is huge.  Than you this feels like the beginning.  ☺ [[br]]
     50•       The tech tools.  Loved Rasha’ framing from the beginning. [[br]]
     51•       The chance to have meaningful discussion with such a great group of folks. [[br]]
     52•       Thought provoking [[br]]
     53•       More time, perhaps more realistic division of agenda time [[br]]
     54•       Action points/breakouts in the afternoon.  Collaborative preparation of the “document” [[br]]
     55•       Great diversity of experience and curiosity of spirit. [[br]]
     56•       Open sharing, passion and commitment.  Thanks for doing it and my participation. [[br]]
     57•       The demos and group discussion because of the selection of who was in the room and how they framed their points. [[br]]
     58•       Everything! [[br]]
    6359
    64 5. Do you have any suggestions for improvements?
    65 •       More facilitation support/prep.  Agreement among facilitators about shared practice/structure to hold folks in the space.
    66 •       The room was difficult – I couldn’t see everyone and felt disconnected sitting in the back.  But I know that was a logistical problem with the room.
     605. Do you have any suggestions for improvements? [[br]]
     61•       More facilitation support/prep.  Agreement among facilitators about shared practice/structure to hold folks in the space. [[br]]
     62•       The room was difficult – I couldn’t see everyone and felt disconnected sitting in the back.  But I know that was a logistical problem with the room. [[br]]
    6763•       Make the PA process more clear, especially the understanding that we’re crafting a statement.
    68 •       “What are you working on?/What do you need?”
    69 •       I would like to see more speaking roles from global partners…
     64•       “What are you working on?/What do you need?” [[br]]
     65•       I would like to see more speaking roles from global partners… [[br]]
    7066
    71 6. Were your personal learning goals met?
    72 •       Yes
    73 •       Yes.  MOAR
    74 •       Yes
    75 •       Yes
    76 •       Yes
    77 •       Yes! Thanks everyone!
    78 •       I didn’t have any specific expectation but found the session highly invigorating, informative, interesting and inspiring.
    79 •       Yes
    80 •       Yes, very much so
    81 •       Yes.
     676. Were your personal learning goals met? [[br]]
     68•       Yes [[br]]
     69•       Yes.  MOAR [[br]]
     70•       Yes [[br]]
     71•       Yes [[br]]
     72•       Yes [[br]]
     73•       Yes! Thanks everyone! [[br]]
     74•       I didn’t have any specific expectation but found the session highly invigorating, informative, interesting and inspiring. [[br]]
     75•       Yes [[br]]
     76•       Yes, very much so [[br]]
     77•       Yes. [[br]]
    8278
    83 If "No," please describe those expectations that were not met.
     79If "No," please describe those expectations that were not met. [[br]]
    8480
    8581
    8682
    87 7. Any other comments?
    88 •       Love Mayfirst
    89 •       Thank you! I really appreciated how facilitators remembered my name and addressed my points. I am so glad there was breakfast and lunch so I would really focus.
    90 •       14 white; 20 people of color; 15 men; 19 women   Awesome!!
    91 •       Thanks! Great job ☺
    92 •       Thank you for your work.
    93 •       Thank you for hosting this panel.
    94 •       It’s great to meet other like minds from around the country,
     837. Any other comments? [[br]]
     84•       Love Mayfirst [[br]]
     85•       Thank you! I really appreciated how facilitators remembered my name and addressed my points. I am so glad there was breakfast and lunch so I would really focus. [[br]]
     86•       14 white; 20 people of color; 15 men; 19 women   Awesome!! [[br]]
     87•       Thanks! Great job ☺ [[br]]
     88•       Thank you for your work. [[br]]
     89•       Thank you for hosting this panel. [[br]]
     90•       It’s great to meet other like minds from around the country [[br]]