22 | | 2. How would you rate the usefulness of the content? |
23 | | Panel Discussion (1 2 3 (1) 4 (5) 5 (7) ) |
24 | | Tech Demo (1 2 3 (3) 4 (4) 5 (5) ) |
25 | | Discussion (1 2 3 (1) 4 (3) 5 (11) ) |
26 | | Comments: |
27 | | • I really loved the small group discussion. Will take back tech tools to my shop. |
28 | | • Discussion after panel could have been moderated a bit more strategically. |
29 | | • Presentations were a bit unprepared and scattered, but very informative |
30 | | • Demo? Loved the discussion. I felt the “demo”session would have been more useful with a screen projector of the tool (a tutorial, but a visual demo) |
31 | | • Great ideas and perspective. Facilities challenge and also facilitation challenged |
32 | | • PMA is hard! Not totally clear how to process |
33 | | • I wish there was a lot more time for the panel because they asked the right questions. |
34 | | • Lightning rounds are good, but did not allow for any literal tech demos |
| 18 | 2. How would you rate the usefulness of the content? [[br]] |
| 19 | Panel Discussion (1 2 3 (1) 4 (5) 5 (7) ) [[br]] |
| 20 | Tech Demo (1 2 3 (3) 4 (4) 5 (5) ) [[br]] |
| 21 | Discussion (1 2 3 (1) 4 (3) 5 (11) ) [[br]] |
| 22 | Comments:[[br]][[br]] |
| 23 | • I really loved the small group discussion. Will take back tech tools to my shop. [[br]] |
| 24 | • Discussion after panel could have been moderated a bit more strategically. [[br]] |
| 25 | • Presentations were a bit unprepared and scattered, but very informative [[br]] |
| 26 | • Demo? Loved the discussion. I felt the “demo”session would have been more useful with a screen projector of the tool (a tutorial, but a visual demo) [[br]] |
| 27 | • Great ideas and perspective. Facilities challenge and also facilitation challenged [[br]] |
| 28 | • PMA is hard! Not totally clear how to process [[br]] |
| 29 | • I wish there was a lot more time for the panel because they asked the right questions. [[br]] |
| 30 | • Lightning rounds are good, but did not allow for any literal tech demos [[br]] |
37 | | 3. Was there anything missing from the discussion or demonstrations? |
38 | | • There could have been more effort to hear from people working directly on or in the tech industry. |
39 | | • Never enough time |
40 | | • Guidelines of engagement might help set context; step up/step back – use the whoa!; oppression exists but not here. Our practice – we resist |
41 | | • Not really! |
42 | | • No |
43 | | • There was a lot said, still observing (something scribbled) |
44 | | • Demonstration of the tools presented (which look great) would have been useful. |
45 | | • Practice – hands on with! More space for what people are working on. Could have asked: “What do YOU need?” |
46 | | • The time to get to understand where other folks experiences in tech came from (even though there was no hint of bias) |
47 | | • Maybe, for the tech demo to have the tools shown on the screen |
48 | | • Full day of conversation instead of a 1-hour workshop |
| 33 | 3. Was there anything missing from the discussion or demonstrations? [[br]] |
| 34 | • There could have been more effort to hear from people working directly on or in the tech industry. [[br]] |
| 35 | • Never enough time [[br]] |
| 36 | • Guidelines of engagement might help set context; step up/step back – use the whoa!; oppression exists but not here. Our practice – we resist [[br]] |
| 37 | • Not really! [[br]] |
| 38 | • No [[br]] |
| 39 | • There was a lot said, still observing (something scribbled) [[br]] |
| 40 | • Demonstration of the tools presented (which look great) would have been useful. [[br]] |
| 41 | • Practice – hands on with! More space for what people are working on. Could have asked: “What do YOU need?” [[br]] |
| 42 | • The time to get to understand where other folks experiences in tech came from (even though there was no hint of bias) [[br]] |
| 43 | • Maybe, for the tech demo to have the tools shown on the screen [[br]] |
| 44 | • Full day of conversation instead of a 1-hour workshop [[br]] |
50 | | 4. What did you like best or find most useful/interesting about the presentation? |
51 | | • International perspectives |
52 | | • Learning from everyones experience and perspective |
53 | | • Leadership in convening this space is huge. Than you this feels like the beginning. ☺ |
54 | | • The tech tools. Loved Rasha’ framing from the beginning. |
55 | | • The chance to have meaningful discussion with such a great group of folks. |
56 | | • Thought provoking |
57 | | • More time, perhaps more realistic division of agenda time |
58 | | • Action points/breakouts in the afternoon. Collaborative preparation of the “document” |
59 | | • Great diversity of experience and curiosity of spirit. |
60 | | • Open sharing, passion and commitment. Thanks for doing it and my participation. |
61 | | • The demos and group discussion because of the selection of who was in the room and how they framed their points. |
62 | | • Everything! |
| 46 | 4. What did you like best or find most useful/interesting about the presentation? [[br]] |
| 47 | • International perspectives [[br]] |
| 48 | • Learning from everyones experience and perspective [[br]] |
| 49 | • Leadership in convening this space is huge. Than you this feels like the beginning. ☺ [[br]] |
| 50 | • The tech tools. Loved Rasha’ framing from the beginning. [[br]] |
| 51 | • The chance to have meaningful discussion with such a great group of folks. [[br]] |
| 52 | • Thought provoking [[br]] |
| 53 | • More time, perhaps more realistic division of agenda time [[br]] |
| 54 | • Action points/breakouts in the afternoon. Collaborative preparation of the “document” [[br]] |
| 55 | • Great diversity of experience and curiosity of spirit. [[br]] |
| 56 | • Open sharing, passion and commitment. Thanks for doing it and my participation. [[br]] |
| 57 | • The demos and group discussion because of the selection of who was in the room and how they framed their points. [[br]] |
| 58 | • Everything! [[br]] |
71 | | 6. Were your personal learning goals met? |
72 | | • Yes |
73 | | • Yes. MOAR |
74 | | • Yes |
75 | | • Yes |
76 | | • Yes |
77 | | • Yes! Thanks everyone! |
78 | | • I didn’t have any specific expectation but found the session highly invigorating, informative, interesting and inspiring. |
79 | | • Yes |
80 | | • Yes, very much so |
81 | | • Yes. |
| 67 | 6. Were your personal learning goals met? [[br]] |
| 68 | • Yes [[br]] |
| 69 | • Yes. MOAR [[br]] |
| 70 | • Yes [[br]] |
| 71 | • Yes [[br]] |
| 72 | • Yes [[br]] |
| 73 | • Yes! Thanks everyone! [[br]] |
| 74 | • I didn’t have any specific expectation but found the session highly invigorating, informative, interesting and inspiring. [[br]] |
| 75 | • Yes [[br]] |
| 76 | • Yes, very much so [[br]] |
| 77 | • Yes. [[br]] |
87 | | 7. Any other comments? |
88 | | • Love Mayfirst |
89 | | • Thank you! I really appreciated how facilitators remembered my name and addressed my points. I am so glad there was breakfast and lunch so I would really focus. |
90 | | • 14 white; 20 people of color; 15 men; 19 women Awesome!! |
91 | | • Thanks! Great job ☺ |
92 | | • Thank you for your work. |
93 | | • Thank you for hosting this panel. |
94 | | • It’s great to meet other like minds from around the country, |
| 83 | 7. Any other comments? [[br]] |
| 84 | • Love Mayfirst [[br]] |
| 85 | • Thank you! I really appreciated how facilitators remembered my name and addressed my points. I am so glad there was breakfast and lunch so I would really focus. [[br]] |
| 86 | • 14 white; 20 people of color; 15 men; 19 women Awesome!! [[br]] |
| 87 | • Thanks! Great job ☺ [[br]] |
| 88 | • Thank you for your work. [[br]] |
| 89 | • Thank you for hosting this panel. [[br]] |
| 90 | • It’s great to meet other like minds from around the country [[br]] |