Version 1 (modified by 11 years ago) ( diff ) | ,
---|
Mexlca - Expansion
Expand existing infrastructue to have more than 1 interpretation channel
Development Approaches
Leave everything as is, and just work on the mexcla.tac (twisted service)
Build a form that creates the channel, and determines how many interpretation channels exist, using the mexcla.tac infrastructure.
Revamp the whole fucking thing and use freeswitch webrtc Sip.js, this option may or may not require also using the mexcla.tac.
Everything in tact
Pros
Easiest to accomplish
Faster
Keeps the same not perfectly beautiful interface.
Not too much work
Cons
Not resolving current problems with mexcla (which might be a problem with the protocol)
Does not improve sound quality.
Does not improve development of webrtc.
Does not fully integrate into our webrtc infrastructure.
Limits user interaction.
Build webform for handling channel creation
Pros
Allows better interaction for people hosting a call.
Permits language designation for the specific interpretation channel, i.e. more info for callers.
Helps expand functionality, specific to each call.
Relatively easy to implement.
Would allow for adding features (pads, irc, calc, presentation, chat) to the channel.
Cons
Would require work, more development and testing.
Would create more bugs.
Revamp
Pros
integrate live (video) and mexcla (audio)
get to learn cool new things
Tighter integration to freeswitch (probably)
Perhaps better audio quality
Would be using websockets.
We'd be cutting edge!!!!
perhaps better integration with live.m.o
Cons
Don't know what we're doing
Possibly lots more bugs
perhaps we end up revamping live.m.o too
Attachments (1)
- Freeswitch mexcla plans.png (57.5 KB ) - added by 11 years ago.
Download all attachments as: .zip