Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #11870, comment 5


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 21, 2016, 12:51:30 PM (6 years ago)
Author:
Chris Thompson
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #11870, comment 5

    initial v1  
    1 I'm pretty sure mlncn had requested SSDs at the outset for jacobs, and I'm not going to argue against their IOP/s & bandwidth superiority. I'm not sure what the default IO scheduling/load balancing looks like, but I think it's been made plain that the headroom they offer will be immediately useful to at least a few of the server instances.
    2 
    3 In re: additional RAM, that's always nice too, of course. I think that on our side, we should attempt some heavy cache warming first to see just how much RAM might really be useful. TBH, I'm not currently inclined to think we'd noticeably benefit from more than it (jacobs) already has.
     1Whoops - relocated comment to #11855